Ask A Question
Have a question? Send it in! It may be featured on one of our posts.
Click Here to Ask
|
|
Written by Duane Long
|
|
Tuesday, 14 July 2009 09:45 |
|
I just don't get it. Offensive line recruiting, I mean. I would like someone who believes in what we are doing to explain it to me. 4 of the top 6 offensive line recruits in the state, 7 if you add Matt Rotherman to the list, have committed. Only 1 to Ohio State. That only one has been offered is all the more frustrating. In case you didn't hear, Andrew Donnal got tired of waiting and verballed Iowa yesterday. So did TE/OL Michael Dennis. He committed to Michigan State. Donnal is a big loss. No matter what Matt James does, Donnal should have had an offer. Adding left tackles should be the first priority for offensive line recruiting. This is the second time in the last three years we have passed on an instate national left tackle who would have accepted the offer no sooner than it arrived. Dennis is not a nationally ranked kid but he looked good enough that they asked him back for a second day of camp. Add to this that I am hearing we don't want Matt James to commit anytime soon as the name that would come out of his mouth right now would not be Ohio State, and I would call this a real mess. You could say that these instate kids not getting offers is just the way things break if we were in good shape with the national linemen we are chasing. We are not. Henderson says USC and Michigan are the schools who will definitely get visits. I want anyone who is coming to this site to stand up and say that does not bother them and that they still like our chances. Chaz Green makes a bizarre statement. He is either going to take all his visits and commit late,......or go ahead and commit to Florida. Look at the other national offensive linemen who we have offered. James Hurst, Brent Benedict, Jimmy Gjere, all committed elsewhere already. Only Hurst gave us any kind of look. We are not a school that top OLs see as a path to the NFL. That is so much a part of out of state recruiting. It takes love of the Buckeyes to want to come here. That means instate kids.We keep passing on them. I could see it if we were loaded. Going after the best of the best makes sense when you are stacked at a position with talent. No reason to take players who can't crack the lineup because of the talent already assembled like we have at defensive end, linebacker and flanker. Not the case on the offensive line.We are so short of talent at tackle that we are not sure who our starter at RT will be. Right now we have 2 guys better off at guard in the 2-deep. We are hoping for a kid who can't stay healthy to win the job. We keep coming back to this problem with offensive line recruiting. Some will come back and say they trust the coaches. If we had a good offensive line year in and year out you could say trust the coaches. We are not a good offensive line year in and year out. We are not a good line every now and then. There is no reason to put any faith in Jim Bollman with offensive line recruiting. It comes back to him. You think Jim Tressel is the one sitting down and going over all these players? He is going with the recommendations from his position coaches and the recruiting coordinator. You can't lay this at the feet of Peterson either. We are in the discussion for Wide Receiver U, Cornerback U, and Linebacker U., so he seems to be making the right calls at other positions. Our offensive line is chronically lacking and it starts with recruiting. When Keith Uecker was hired I speculated that he would step in and Bollman would retire in a year, maybe 2. Every day I am hoping more and more that it is a year. I think we get closer every day to an offensive line class of one.
|
|
DLR Newsletter
Sign up for The Duane Long Report Newsletter and you'll receive an email alert of all our new posts.
|